I HAVE THE IMPRESSION THAT THE EURO WAS IN FACT FORWARD AN ESCAPE

You will have heard and read numerous thesis so much social as economic that they refer to the action denominated "escape forward" companies that go aboard in the creation of a new and bad product like only salvation possibility before the fall of their benefits and they fail hopelessly, something similar it happens to some marriages that they decide to have a son waiting before the vision of a hopeless break that this them an and most of the times neither work with what an increase of the problem takes place because what was now of two becomes of three.  

For where I go you wondered when reading this first since paragraph the described examples I want to accommodate them to the action of the UE and the creation of the EURO I believe sincerely that in view of the results the creation of an unique currency was in fact forward a resource of an escape to continue with an European Union that in fact had arrived to its political and economic roof. It is already enough of fears and terrible presage of disasters on what would happen if somebody dares to leave the Euro, all the apocalyptic manifestations in this respect they make them alone the countries that if he goes them well the euro and the politicians that pay them the you nominate with them without fail every month and other things. They are because totally interested and false opinions, we will analyze why. 

Possibly nobody waited this when make the unique currency, for sure it was thought that you toward a great step for the European Union that the unique currency would unite what the politics didn't want to unite for interests political and old nationalisms. But the result has been just the opposite the euro it has enlarged more and more the differences among the nations that you/they try to maintain the European Union. 

It has not been alone the politics the one that has caused the current disaster, although in the bottom the political administration with their interest in denying the evidences that were accentuated more and more, it has taken the disaster to unsuspected bench marks, of that if it is necessary to accuse her, but it has been the Euro the one that has marked the abysmal incongruities and distances among the European Nations. It was already demonstrated that a foreign currency doesn't sustain an economy but rather the other way around it is the economy the one that sustains and he gives value to a foreign currency.   

This experience one lived in Argentina where the president Carlos Menem sanctioned the Law of Convertibility with the dollar in 1991, because the Argentinean economy fainted, the effect was good in first instance it stopped the inflation and a politics economic neoliberal was adopted, supported in a wave of privatizations, reduction of tariffs and deregulation of the markets. These measures contributed to increase the investment, the exports and the growth significantly with stable prices. But, on the other hand, they also opened a des industrialization process in the face of the impossibility of competition of the weakened Argentinean industry that I don't change, era the same one that had collapsed to the country with the “peso”, but on the contrary at the little time they made to the most vulnerable economy to the international crises, and the unemployment, the poverty and the labor precariousness increased. 

They sound them these disasters because we can transfer them to Europe almost made had made here we didn't make the convertibility with the worst dollar we even made it with something that we don't know today that is, we even made it with the Euro, it is the same reaction we convert the foreign currencies from each nation to a single parity without keeping in mind the basic differences of each nation their industrialization their saving capacity their competitiveness and with an added difficulty, without any intention of homogenizing them administrative and politically, the failure of the combination Argentina has multiplied here for 17. Those that introduced the idea made it because evidently it favored them vastly because in principle they were the other ones those that had to come closer to them they never thought that they would should of coming closer to the other ones. 

So the results are visible and to understand it better we could say that Europe made a convertibility with the German mark, and to disguise him of neutrality you invention the Euro, but in definitive what was made was that a play of convertibility of foreign currencies in a, and this has had the same road that had in Argentina first I put an end to the inflation and I regulate it, you bolts the economy, and the consumption in several countries, you other give to industrialized, got in debt all, and at the end now is not exit.  

It is impossible for some national economies to leave airy of their own situation, Greece will never be able to pay its debt, Italy will never be able to recover its industry, and Spain will never be able to put an end to the unemployment that sinks it in the misery, and if you are valiant and they look back, they will see that has never happened this if Spain has continued with its Peseta, and its industry, and its demography, the same thing has passed with Italy and its Lira, and let us don't already say of Greece to begin has not had necessity to manipulate its bills, to deceive all Europe. 

Now the cake already this cooked and some seem that they like it, but they don't want to share it, so they don't know how to fix it and he scares them that if it is uncovered that it is not as good as he looks like each other them indigested because it is a lot of cake for so little economy, the tactics now is the catastrophic the one that leaves the little euro but that falls in the devil's fauceses it will be rejected and reviled by the markets etc. but it is that if they don't separate the euro, the different economies (for not calling ourselves poor) we don't have possibility some of modifying our situation, like we go in Spain to compete with the German productivity with a load of 40 thousand million cost Eurus for unemployment at the year, and 60,000 of debt interests, without any industrial fabric with capacity to absorb it, because the industry is in the center and europa north, like our GDP that we will create will increase or it is that we will find petroleum for example, and this is valid for Greece Portugal Italy and already for France. 

In Europe the competitiveness has ended because there is not form of competing each one he stays its advantage for yes and the unique currency impedes the competition among economies that share the same currency, like I can Spain to begin to manufacture cars for example, or televisions, I eat up I will make the competition to myself, against who compete, against the French industry, the German, the Italian, in summary against the European that is also mine, it is of crazy. 

Or he settles down the true European Union once and for all in the one that you re equilibrant and the work flows are compensated, productions, manpower, credits, saving taxes, and of course the general politics, or the best thing is to be left the euro and to fight then with the tools that he can prepare, very cheap manpower, associations with multinationals of Asian origin, to be able to compete with the Europeans that have mashed me, capitals of other origins that they don't doubt it would be them very interesting and beneficial, it is not necessary to be afraid, if you leaves the euro you goes out with the same debt that now drowns us alone that translated to pesetas.  

Starting from here everything he/she transforms because these bills are the same ones for Italy France Portugal etc. and it is the only form that Europe that doesn't want to be a single Europe can be at least a continent open to the initiative and to the individual progress of each one of their towns like it was always it, unless the towns disappear and become one alone and in a single economy.